|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
WHAT IS BARCODE VERIFICATION..?
QUALITY CONTROL FOR BAR CODES! Verification measures the printed quality of the bar code to international (ISO) standards. This is the standard used by retailers worldwide. According to international standards, verification is mandatory for all companies either designing or printing their own bar codes, ensuring that an acceptable image is created.
Despite the complex nature of verification equipment it should be simple to use and display the results in clear, easy to interpret terms. The Verifier should be the bar code expert in your organization, removing the burden of knowledge from your staff. If the format of the bar code is incorrect, the size too large or too small or the print quality unacceptable, the symbol will fail to scan. The supply chain is broken. The number needs to be entered manually – perhaps incorrectly. A customer incorrectly charged. Wrong goods ordered or dispatched.
In many cases a poorly printed barcode is worse than no bar code at all!
WHY VERIFY YOUR BAR CODES..?
Bar code quality is vital, as every time a bar code fails to scan, costs are incurred. At best the data is required to be input manually whilst at worst deliveries are rejected. A recent survey by the e-centre (EAN UK) put the cost of poor quality bar codes at over £500 million! Until recently, many retailers have accepted these costs as a ´fact of trading life´. However, an ever increasing number of major retailers are now taking a very different approach by passing these costs back to suppliers. Goods are returned and fines imposed. For repeat offenders the ultimate sanction can be, and has been, delisting as a supplier.
Insurance But it´s more than that. As part of an effective QA system it can help you win business. Are your competitors using verification? Are they questioning the quality of your bar codes with your customers? Is it affecting your business?
Why was the ISO/CEN/ANSI method introduced? Prior to the Current ISO standard of verifying printed bar code symbols, only two factors were taken into consideration:
− Dimensional accuracy of the bars
and spaces. This traditional method would have been a reasonable way of assessing the print quality, except that there was no agreed way of determining where bar edges actually were or how and where reflectance measurements should be made. As well as this, bar codes were being measured with differing beams of light (apertures). Both of these factors resulted in a wide variation of results between verifiers. With the variety of uses for bar codes and the wide range of printing techniques used, it was felt that a more scientific approach was needed. In particular it was noted that different scanners and the differing environments in which these were used resulted in some aspects of poor print quality being more significant than others. Simple reflectance measurements were also found not to be helpful when the contrast might vary within the symbol. A definition of where a bar-space transition actually occurred was required as were specific aperture sizes dependent upon the symbology and size of bar code. These were then the main elements of the method that was initially written up as an ANSI standard. This was then adopted by CEN and eventually became an ISO standard. A Scan Reflectance Profile (an analogue graph of the reflectance values of a defined wavelength of light from a bar code symbol across a scan path) was to be analysed and specific measurements made from this profile in order to grade the scan. It was also specified that a single scan was not enough for an overall symbol grade to be decided and scans should therefore be taken at up to ten different heights within the symbol. The average of these results then becomes the overall symbol grade. This method has proven to be a thoroughly scientific approach but one that is also accepted and generally understood by users of bar codes throughout the world. The grading method is also easy to understand and different grade requirements can be set for various applications of bar code technology without the method needing to change. In recent testing of verification equipment from various manufacturers, the method has also proved to solve the main problem with the traditional approach, as it was found that different pieces of equipment gave the same results when applied to reference symbols.
| Home | Wand Readers | CCD Readers | Linear Imagers | Laser Scanners | Presentation Scanners | | Cordless Scanners | 2D bar Code Scanners | Mobile Computers | Desktop Label Printers | | Mid Range Label Printers | Industrial Label Printers | Label Printing Software | ID Card Printers | | Hand Held / Portable Bar Code Verifiers | PC-Based Bar Code Verifiers | Bar Code Fonts | |Scanning Mobile Phone IMEI Numbers | Contact Us | Sitemap | Barcoding Your Products? | | Which Bar Code Reader? | Which Bar Code Printer? | Why Verify Your Bar Codes? | | Need an Engineer? | Got a Faulty Scanner? |
Thermal Print Heads - DATAMAX - INTERMEC - TEC - ZEBRA/ELTRON Labels & Ribbons - DATAMAX - INTERMEC - TEC - ZEBRA/ELTRON Useful Links - |The E-Centre | Periodical Publishing | ISBN Numbering for Books | AIM UK | |General EAN.UCC Specification v5.0 | Speed Up Adobe Reader! |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| DRAGON SOLUTIONS BARCODING 121 Bracadale Drive | Davenport | Stockport | Cheshire | SK3 8RY | |||||||||||||||||||